Unfortunately, if people feel that their sense of right and wrong i. e. non-public, cultural, moral, or differently directs them not to engage in sure sexual behaviors they find negatively impacting their lives, sex therapists may try to invalidate those feelings as being prudish or extraordinarily moralistic. Furthermore, Zoldbrod implicitly shares her own views on fit sexuality by affirming one of her male client’s needs for sexual excitement. “One of my sufferers quipped, ‘For guys, having a lot of different women is an analogous as women and their shoes. No matter how neat the shoes you have already got are, it’s always exciting to get a new pair. More recent analysis has expandedupon the customary surveys and anecdotal case study reviews. However, as I will illustratebelow later, even these stories don’t aid the conclusions the authors claim. The usual analysis into this sickness began withexploratory surveys, which cannot establish causal relationships between precise behaviors and their cause. While surveys may help establish descriptions of how people feel about themselves and theirbehaviors, they cannot draw conclusions about whether a particular generation, reminiscent of the Internet,has truly caused those behaviors. Those conclusions which are drawn are purely speculative and subjectivemade by the researchers themselves. Researchers have a name for this logical fallacy,ignoring a common cause. Case experiences, the option to surveys used for lots of conclusions drawn about online overuse,are just as problematic. How can we really draw any cost-effective conclusions about hundreds of thousands ofpeople online based upon one or two case studies?Yet media stories, and a few researchers, coveringthis issue generally use a case study to help “illustrate” the difficulty. All a case study doesis have an effect on our emotional reactions to the issue; it does nothing to help us furtherunderstand the true problem and the various expertise reasons for it. Case studieson an argument like this are often a red flag that help frame the issuein an emotional light, leaving hard, scientific data out of the image. It is a commondiversionary tactic. And this speaks to the larger problem these researchersgrapple with.